The measurement derived from a standardized evaluation administered by Kaplan serves as an indicator of a pupil’s preparedness for standardized examinations such because the NCLEX (Nationwide Council Licensure Examination). This metric supplies a numerical illustration of a person’s strengths and weaknesses throughout varied topic areas related to the goal examination. For instance, a results of 70% may counsel a powerful understanding of core ideas, whereas a decrease proportion may point out areas requiring additional research.
Reaching a passable end result on this evaluation is essential for a number of causes. It permits college students to determine data gaps and allocate research time successfully. This focused method to preparation can result in elevated confidence and improved efficiency on the precise licensing or certification examination. Traditionally, establishments have used these metrics to gauge the effectiveness of their curricula and to supply further help to college students susceptible to underperforming.
Understanding the importance of the numerical indicator is simply step one. The next sections will delve into the particular parts of the Kaplan evaluation, methods for bettering efficiency, and the assets accessible to help college students in reaching their desired consequence. Additional dialogue will deal with deciphering the detailed rating reviews and using them to personalize research plans.
1. Predictive Validity
Predictive validity, within the context of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating, refers back to the extent to which the rating precisely forecasts a pupil’s efficiency on the precise licensure or certification examination. It is a essential metric for evaluating the effectiveness of the Kaplan evaluation as a preparatory software. A excessive diploma of predictive validity signifies that the Kaplan rating is a dependable indicator of future success.
-
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient quantifies the statistical relationship between the Kaplan Readiness Check rating and efficiency on the precise examination. A coefficient nearer to 1.0 suggests a powerful optimistic correlation, indicating the next probability of success on the examination for college kids who obtain larger Kaplan scores. Conversely, a coefficient nearer to 0 signifies a weak or non-existent relationship, suggesting the Kaplan rating will not be a dependable predictor.
-
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sensitivity refers back to the means of the Kaplan Readiness Check to accurately determine college students who will go the precise examination. Specificity, however, signifies its means to precisely determine those that will fail. Excessive sensitivity ensures that few probably profitable candidates are falsely recognized as being unprepared, whereas excessive specificity minimizes the chance of unprepared candidates being falsely reassured by a excessive Kaplan rating.
-
Lower-Off Scores and Cross Charges
Establishments typically set up cut-off scores on the Kaplan Readiness Check as a benchmark for figuring out pupil readiness. A pupil exceeding the cut-off rating is deemed adequately ready. The go price on the precise examination for college kids above the cut-off rating supplies a tangible measure of predictive validity. Increased go charges above the cut-off rating display a stronger predictive functionality of the Kaplan evaluation.
-
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal research that observe pupil efficiency over time, evaluating Kaplan Readiness Check scores with subsequent examination outcomes, present strong proof of predictive validity. These research can reveal whether or not the predictive energy of the Kaplan rating holds true throughout totally different cohorts of scholars and varied administrations of the licensure or certification examination. This permits for steady refinement of the Kaplan evaluation and cut-off rating suggestions.
In abstract, the predictive validity of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating is paramount in justifying its use as a preparatory software. By evaluating the correlation coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, cut-off scores, and longitudinal information, stakeholders can assess the reliability of the Kaplan evaluation and its means to precisely forecast pupil success on high-stakes examinations. A powerful predictive validity strengthens the rationale for integrating Kaplan into instructional curricula and advising particular person research plans.
2. Particular person Efficiency
Particular person efficiency, as measured by the Kaplan Readiness Check rating, supplies a granular evaluation of a pupil’s proficiency throughout the assorted topic areas coated within the goal licensure or certification examination. The rating isn’t merely an mixture quantity however a composite reflecting strengths and weaknesses in particular content material domains. As an illustration, a pupil may display excessive proficiency in pharmacology however battle with medical-surgical nursing. This disparity is mirrored within the detailed breakdown supplied alongside the general Kaplan Readiness Check rating. The causal hyperlink is evident: a deeper understanding of particular material immediately interprets to the next rating in that part, influencing the general composite.
The significance of particular person efficiency inside the Kaplan Readiness Check rating framework lies in its diagnostic functionality. This detailed evaluation permits college students to focus their research efforts on areas the place they’re demonstrably weak. For instance, if a nursing pupil scores poorly within the “Fundamentals of Nursing” part of the Kaplan check, they’ll then dedicate extra time to reviewing the core ideas and practising related questions in that space. With out this degree of granularity, college students may waste useful research time on subjects they already perceive properly, neglecting areas requiring remediation. Moreover, establishments make the most of particular person efficiency metrics to tailor supplemental instruction and assets to deal with particular studying gaps inside their pupil inhabitants.
In conclusion, the Kaplan Readiness Check rating provides vital perception into particular person efficiency, extending past a easy numerical illustration of preparedness. It capabilities as a diagnostic software, revealing areas of power and weak point. This detailed data permits for focused research efforts, bettering total examination readiness. Challenges might come up if college students or establishments fail to leverage the granular information supplied by the Kaplan evaluation, as a substitute focusing solely on the general rating. The true worth lies in utilizing particular person efficiency information to personalize research plans and academic interventions, thereby maximizing the probability of success on the licensure or certification examination.
3. Content material Mastery
Content material mastery, within the context of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating, signifies the diploma to which a person comprehends and retains the knowledge obligatory for achievement on the goal examination. It’s a main determinant of the ultimate Kaplan rating and a vital indicator of total readiness.
-
Conceptual Understanding
Conceptual understanding displays the flexibility to understand underlying ideas and theoretical frameworks, not merely rote memorization of details. As an illustration, in a nursing context, a pupil demonstrating conceptual understanding may clarify the physiological mechanisms of a specific illness course of quite than merely reciting the signs. A Kaplan Readiness Check rating will mirror weak conceptual understanding via incorrect utility of ideas in scenario-based questions.
-
Data Recall
Data recall refers back to the means to retrieve related details, figures, and terminology when wanted. That is demonstrated via the right identification of pharmacological brokers, regular laboratory values, or anatomical buildings. The Kaplan Readiness Check immediately assesses this via discrete recall questions. A poor data recall typically manifests as frequent choice of incorrect solutions because of reminiscence lapses.
-
Software of Data
Software of information entails the capability to make the most of acquired data in sensible eventualities. That is typically assessed by way of case research or medical simulations. As an illustration, a medical pupil may have to diagnose a affected person based mostly on a introduced historical past and bodily examination findings. A decrease Kaplan Readiness Check rating typically displays an incapability to use theoretical data to simulated real-world conditions.
-
Important Reasoning
Important reasoning entails the flexibility to investigate data, determine patterns, and draw logical conclusions. That is important for deciphering advanced questions and making knowledgeable choices below stress. For instance, a legislation pupil may want to judge the validity of authorized arguments or assess the moral implications of a specific plan of action. The Kaplan Readiness Check assesses vital reasoning via advanced, multi-step questions. A better rating typically correlates with robust analytical abilities and a capability for sound judgment.
In the end, content material mastery, as evaluated by the Kaplan Readiness Check rating, is a multi-faceted assemble. It encompasses not solely the buildup of information but in addition the flexibility to use it successfully in various conditions. A powerful Kaplan rating is a results of this complete understanding and serves as a robust predictor of success on the precise licensing or certification examination. Conversely, a weaker rating highlights areas the place content material mastery is missing, offering college students with useful insights for focused research and remediation.
4. Recognized Weaknesses
The Kaplan Readiness Check rating serves, partly, as a mechanism for the exact identification of educational deficiencies. The rating alone supplies a quantitative measure of total preparedness; nonetheless, the accompanying diagnostic report delineates particular areas of weak point. These recognized weaknesses should not merely arbitrary labels however characterize topic areas or ability units the place a pupil’s efficiency falls under a predefined threshold deemed obligatory for achievement on the goal examination. For instance, a nursing pupil might obtain a suitable total Kaplan Readiness Check rating, but the diagnostic report might reveal a big deficit in pharmacology calculations. This focused perception permits the scholar to focus subsequent research efforts exactly the place they’re most wanted, quite than partaking in a generalized evaluate of all materials.
The influence of precisely figuring out weaknesses on the effectiveness of the check preparation course of can’t be overstated. Previous to the provision of such detailed diagnostic assessments, college students have been typically left to self-diagnose their studying wants, a course of vulnerable to error and inefficiency. The Kaplan Readiness Check rating, paired with its diagnostic part, mitigates this problem. Establishments additionally profit from this data, as they’ll use mixture information on recognized weaknesses to refine their curricula and supply focused help to college students struggling in particular areas. Contemplate a legislation faculty the place a majority of scholars persistently carry out poorly on the contracts portion of the Kaplan evaluation. This information would immediate the legislation faculty to re-evaluate its contracts curriculum and probably implement supplementary instruction.
In conclusion, the interaction between the Kaplan Readiness Check rating and the identification of weaknesses is prime to bettering pupil outcomes on high-stakes examinations. The rating supplies an preliminary measure of preparedness, whereas the diagnostic report provides actionable insights into particular areas requiring enchancment. By leveraging this data successfully, college students can optimize their research methods, and establishments can improve their instructional applications, resulting in larger go charges and improved skilled competence. The important thing problem lies in guaranteeing that each college students and educators perceive the right way to interpret and make the most of the diagnostic information supplied by the Kaplan Readiness Check to its full potential.
5. Remediation Methods
The effectiveness of remediation methods is intrinsically linked to the knowledge derived from the Kaplan Readiness Check rating. The evaluation identifies particular areas the place a pupil’s efficiency falls under acceptable ranges, making a basis upon which focused remediation efforts will be constructed. With out the diagnostic specificity supplied by the Kaplan evaluation, remediation turns into generalized and probably inefficient. As an illustration, if the Kaplan evaluation reveals deficiencies in cardiovascular physiology, a pupil can then have interaction in targeted evaluate of related textbooks, apply questions, and probably search supplemental instruction in that particular space. This focused method maximizes the usage of research time and assets, resulting in improved content material mastery and a corresponding enhance within the subsequent Kaplan Readiness Check rating.
Moreover, the Kaplan platform typically supplies assets immediately tailor-made to deal with the recognized weaknesses. These might embody video lectures, apply quizzes, and simulated examinations targeted on the particular content material areas the place the scholar struggled. Establishments, leveraging mixture Kaplan Readiness Check rating information, can implement broader remediation applications, similar to providing workshops or tutoring classes on generally poor subjects. For instance, if a big variety of college students display weak point in authorized ethics as recognized by the Kaplan evaluation, a legislation faculty may institute a compulsory ethics workshop. The iterative strategy of evaluation, focused remediation, and reassessment permits college students to repeatedly refine their data and abilities, guaranteeing complete preparedness for the precise licensing or certification examination. The causal impact is evident: applicable and exactly focused remediation methods, guided by a radical understanding of particular person weak point as recognized within the Kaplan Readiness Check, may end up in improved examination efficiency.
In abstract, the Kaplan Readiness Check rating and efficient remediation methods function in a symbiotic relationship. The evaluation serves because the diagnostic software, pinpointing areas of deficiency, whereas the remediation methods present the corrective measures. The success of this technique hinges upon the correct interpretation of the Kaplan evaluation outcomes and the implementation of focused, resource-efficient remediation efforts. Challenges might come up if college students disregard the detailed diagnostic data supplied by the Kaplan evaluation, opting as a substitute for generalized research methods. Efficient utility of applicable remediation, aligned with information, will finally end in improved examination readiness.
6. Progress Monitoring
The Kaplan Readiness Check rating, when utilized successfully, serves as a vital instrument for progress monitoring all through a pupil’s check preparation journey. Constant and systematic progress monitoring, facilitated by repeated administrations of the Kaplan Readiness Check, permits college students to objectively observe their enchancment in particular topic areas. A rising rating signifies efficient research methods and elevated content material mastery, whereas a stagnant or declining rating necessitates a reevaluation of research methods and useful resource allocation. This cyclical method to preparation underscores the significance of the Kaplan evaluation not simply as a one-time diagnostic software, however as an ongoing measure of studying and adaptation. For instance, a pupil initially scoring low in vital care nursing might, via targeted research and repeated Kaplan assessments, observe a gradual and sustained enchancment in that particular space. This optimistic suggestions reinforces the effectiveness of the chosen research strategies and motivates continued effort.
The sensible utility of progress monitoring extends past particular person research habits. Instructional establishments can leverage mixture Kaplan Readiness Check rating information to evaluate the effectiveness of their curricula and educational strategies. By monitoring the progress of complete cohorts of scholars over time, establishments can determine traits in pupil efficiency and pinpoint areas the place curriculum modifications or further help assets are wanted. If, for example, a constant decline in Kaplan scores is noticed following a change within the instructing methodology for constitutional legislation, the establishment can re-evaluate the brand new method and make obligatory changes. The advantages are clear: improved pupil outcomes, extra environment friendly useful resource allocation, and a demonstrably efficient instructional program. Challenges might emerge if progress monitoring is inconsistent, or if the Kaplan Readiness Check rating is considered as a punitive measure quite than a software for enchancment.
In conclusion, progress monitoring, inextricably linked to the Kaplan Readiness Check rating, is an integral part of profitable check preparation. It supplies college students with goal suggestions on their studying progress, allows focused changes to review methods, and empowers establishments to refine their curricula and educational strategies. The cyclical nature of evaluation, remediation, and reassessment fosters steady enchancment and maximizes the probability of success on high-stakes examinations. The important thing lies in adopting a proactive and data-driven method to progress monitoring, viewing the Kaplan evaluation as a useful software for steady studying and adaptation, quite than a mere snapshot of preparedness.
7. Curriculum Analysis
Curriculum analysis, when thought-about along with the Kaplan Readiness Check rating, supplies a mechanism for assessing the effectiveness of instructional applications in making ready college students for licensure or certification examinations. The Kaplan Readiness Check rating, serving as an goal measure of pupil preparedness, provides useful information factors that may be analyzed to determine areas of curricular power and weak point. This data-driven method to curriculum analysis permits establishments to make knowledgeable choices relating to program content material, educational strategies, and useful resource allocation.
-
Content material Alignment
Content material alignment refers back to the diploma to which the curriculum adequately covers the subject material examined on the licensure or certification examination, as mirrored within the Kaplan Readiness Check content material domains. A low mixture Kaplan Readiness Check rating in a particular topic space might point out an absence of adequate protection within the corresponding curriculum module. For instance, if nursing college students persistently rating poorly on the pharmacology part of the Kaplan evaluation, the nursing curriculum might must be revised to incorporate extra in-depth pharmacology content material and apply workouts. This ensures that college students obtain the mandatory data and abilities to succeed on the examination.
-
Tutorial Effectiveness
Tutorial effectiveness issues the efficacy of the instructing strategies used to ship the curriculum content material. Even when the curriculum covers all related subjects, ineffective instruction can result in poor pupil efficiency on the Kaplan Readiness Check. Excessive Kaplan scores are a mirrored image of efficient educational methodologies. Evaluation of Kaplan Readiness Check scores, coupled with pupil suggestions and classroom observations, will help determine areas the place educational strategies must be improved. For instance, if college students persistently battle with advanced problem-solving questions on the Kaplan evaluation, instructors might have to include extra energetic studying methods and real-world case research into their instructing.
-
Useful resource Adequacy
Useful resource adequacy encompasses the provision and high quality of studying supplies, similar to textbooks, on-line assets, and simulation gear, used to help pupil studying. Inadequate or outdated assets can hinder pupil progress and negatively influence their Kaplan Readiness Check scores. Constant efficiency on the Kaplan evaluation is enhanced by appropriate assets. Establishments ought to recurrently consider the adequacy of their assets and make obligatory investments to make sure that college students have entry to the instruments they should succeed. For instance, a legislation faculty might have to replace its library assortment with the newest authorized treatises and on-line databases to help pupil studying and enhance their efficiency on the Kaplan evaluation.
-
Evaluation Validity
Evaluation validity pertains to the alignment of inner course assessments with the content material and format of the Kaplan Readiness Check and the goal licensure or certification examination. Discrepancies between course assessments and the Kaplan evaluation can create a false sense of preparedness, resulting in disappointing outcomes on the precise examination. A properly designed curriculum will embody evaluation. Establishments ought to try to create course assessments that precisely mirror the cognitive calls for of the Kaplan Readiness Check and the licensure/certification examination. This may contain incorporating extra multiple-choice questions, case research, and demanding considering workouts into course assessments.
In abstract, the Kaplan Readiness Check rating supplies a useful metric for evaluating the effectiveness of instructional curricula. By analyzing Kaplan scores in relation to content material alignment, educational effectiveness, useful resource adequacy, and evaluation validity, establishments can determine areas the place their applications are succeeding and areas the place enhancements are wanted. This data-driven method to curriculum analysis finally results in higher pupil outcomes and better go charges on licensure or certification examinations. The constant utilization of Kaplan Readiness Check scores will permit for a steady evolution in curriculum, optimizing studying for college kids.
8. Comparative Evaluation
Comparative evaluation, within the context of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating, entails evaluating a pupil’s efficiency relative to varied benchmarks, offering a extra nuanced understanding of their preparedness. The rating itself provides an absolute measure, however its significance is amplified compared towards related reference factors. These benchmarks can embody the common rating of the scholar’s cohort, the historic efficiency of earlier pupil teams on the similar establishment, or the common scores achieved by college students who efficiently handed the precise licensing or certification examination. This comparative method permits for a contextualization of the person’s rating, mitigating the restrictions of relying solely on a single numerical worth.
The implementation of comparative evaluation enhances the utility of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating by revealing patterns and figuring out potential areas of concern. For instance, a pupil reaching a Kaplan Readiness Check rating barely under the passing threshold may be thought-about “in danger.” Nevertheless, if that rating is considerably above the common for his or her cohort, it may point out that the scholar is performing properly relative to their friends, regardless of not assembly absolutely the passing normal. Conversely, a rating above the passing threshold, however considerably under the common of scholars who finally handed the licensing examination, may sign a false sense of safety and necessitate additional preparation. Establishments profit from comparative evaluation as properly. A persistently lower-than-average Kaplan efficiency by a cohort, relative to earlier years, might point out a have to re-evaluate curriculum or instructing methodologies.
In conclusion, comparative evaluation elevates the Kaplan Readiness Check rating from a mere metric to a useful diagnostic software. By situating particular person efficiency inside broader comparative frameworks, college students and establishments acquire a extra full and actionable understanding of preparedness. The challenges lie in guaranteeing entry to related comparative information and in growing the analytical abilities essential to interpret the information successfully. A considerate implementation of comparative evaluation helps to optimize research methods, improve instructional applications, and finally enhance outcomes on high-stakes licensure and certification examinations.
Incessantly Requested Questions
The next questions tackle widespread inquiries relating to the interpretation and utilization of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating as a measure of preparedness for high-stakes examinations. These solutions are designed to supply readability and promote efficient check preparation methods.
Query 1: How is the Kaplan Readiness Check rating calculated?
The Kaplan Readiness Check rating is derived from a proprietary algorithm that weighs efficiency throughout varied topic areas related to the goal examination. It’s not merely a proportion of right solutions; quite, it takes under consideration the problem degree of the questions answered accurately and should incorporate scaled scoring to regulate for variations in check kind problem.
Query 2: What constitutes a “good” Kaplan Readiness Check rating?
A “good” Kaplan Readiness Check rating is relative to the particular necessities and expectations of the academic establishment or program administering the check. Typically, a rating exceeding a pre-determined benchmark, typically set by the establishment based mostly on historic information and predictive validity research, is taken into account passable. It’s essential to seek the advice of with educational advisors to know the particular rating expectations for a specific program.
Query 3: Can the Kaplan Readiness Check rating assure success on the precise licensure examination?
The Kaplan Readiness Check rating is a predictor of efficiency, not a assure of success. Whereas a excessive Kaplan rating signifies a powerful probability of passing the precise licensure examination, it doesn’t eradicate the necessity for continued research and preparation. Exterior elements, similar to check nervousness and unexpected circumstances, may also affect efficiency on the precise examination.
Query 4: How ought to recognized weaknesses be addressed after reviewing the Kaplan Readiness Check outcomes?
Recognized weaknesses needs to be addressed via focused research and remediation methods. This will likely contain reviewing related textbooks and course supplies, finishing further apply questions within the poor areas, and searching for help from instructors or tutors. The Kaplan platform typically supplies particular assets tailor-made to deal with recognized weaknesses.
Query 5: How typically ought to the Kaplan Readiness Check be taken to observe progress?
The frequency with which the Kaplan Readiness Check is taken to observe progress relies on the person’s research schedule and the time remaining earlier than the precise licensure examination. Typically, taking the check each few weeks permits for adequate time to implement remediation methods and observe significant modifications in efficiency. Constant monitoring is essential for efficient check preparation.
Query 6: Are there any limitations to relying solely on the Kaplan Readiness Check rating for assessing preparedness?
Relying solely on the Kaplan Readiness Check rating will be limiting, because it represents just one measure of preparedness. You will need to take into account different elements, similar to efficiency in coursework, medical expertise (if relevant), and self-assessment of information and abilities. A holistic method to preparation, incorporating a number of sources of data, is really useful.
In conclusion, the Kaplan Readiness Check rating supplies useful insights right into a pupil’s preparedness for high-stakes examinations. Nevertheless, it needs to be interpreted inside the context of particular person circumstances, institutional expectations, and a complete method to check preparation.
The next part will delve into methods for maximizing the advantages of the Kaplan Readiness Check and optimizing total test-taking efficiency.
Methods for Optimizing Efficiency on Assessments
The next suggestions are supposed to facilitate enhanced efficiency on preparatory standardized evaluations. Adherence to those pointers is projected to yield an enchancment in metrics reflecting content material mastery and test-taking proficiency.
Tip 1: Implement a Structured Research Schedule: Constant and scheduled research classes are simpler than sporadic, unstructured evaluate. Allocate particular time slots for every topic space, adhering to a schedule that accommodates particular person studying types and every day routines. For instance, dedicate two hours every night to reviewing materials and finishing apply questions.
Tip 2: Prioritize Areas of Weak point: Establish and tackle areas of deficiency via targeted research. The diagnostic report supplied along with the numerical indicator pinpoints particular topics requiring further consideration. Commit a disproportionate quantity of research time to those areas, guaranteeing a balanced understanding throughout all domains.
Tip 3: Make the most of Numerous Studying Assets: Make use of quite a lot of studying assets to reinforce comprehension and retention. Complement textbook readings with video lectures, on-line apply questions, and research teams. This multi-faceted method caters to totally different studying types and reinforces key ideas.
Tip 4: Observe Below Simulated Check Situations: Frequently full apply assessments below timed situations to simulate the precise testing atmosphere. This helps to construct stamina, enhance time administration abilities, and cut back check nervousness. Analyze efficiency on these simulated assessments to determine areas for additional enchancment.
Tip 5: Interact in Lively Recall: Lively recall, the method of retrieving data from reminiscence with out counting on exterior assets, strengthens retention and improves vital considering abilities. Make the most of methods similar to flashcards, self-testing, and instructing ideas to others to actively have interaction with the fabric.
Tip 6: Evaluation and Analyze Efficiency: After every apply check or research session, meticulously evaluate efficiency and determine areas the place errors occurred. Analyze the reasoning behind each right and incorrect solutions to realize a deeper understanding of the underlying ideas and to keep away from repeating errors.
Tip 7: Keep a Wholesome Way of life: Satisfactory sleep, common train, and a balanced weight loss plan are important for optimum cognitive perform and test-taking efficiency. Prioritize these components of a wholesome life-style to maximise focus, reminiscence, and total well-being.
Constant utility of those methods, predicated on a practical appraisal of private strengths and weaknesses, serves to optimize preparatory outcomes. Profitable implementation necessitates a structured method, knowledgeable by diligent self-assessment.
The next part provides concluding remarks on the importance of standardized evaluation in skilled licensure and certification processes.
Conclusion
The previous dialogue has illuminated the multi-faceted function of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating within the panorama {of professional} preparation. From its diagnostic capabilities in figuring out particular person weaknesses to its utility in evaluating curricular effectiveness, the metric serves as a useful software for each college students and establishments. The evaluation underscored the significance of deciphering the numerical indicator inside the context of broader comparative information and of using focused remediation methods to deal with recognized areas of deficiency. The validity and reliability of those scores, nonetheless, are contingent upon constant and rigorous implementation of the testing protocol and accountable interpretation of the ensuing information.
The final word significance of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating lies in its potential to reinforce the preparedness of future professionals, contributing to improved competence and enhanced public security. Its efficient use requires a dedication to data-driven decision-making and a recognition of its limitations as a singular measure of means. Continued analysis and refinement of evaluation methodologies are important to make sure the continuing relevance and validity of the Kaplan Readiness Check rating within the face of evolving skilled requirements.
